Wednesday, July 13, 2005
Denial is a basic human feature. In fact, most of our lives are based on denial, and they would not run without it. But in many cases, denial is a dangerous fact.
I define ‘denial’ as a sub-conscious negation and conscious ignorance (or, in rare cases, also negation) of a fact (or what should be perceived as a fact). The fact does not have to be something unpleasant.
Denial is primarily a necessity for our survival. A doting parent of an ugly child does not realise its child’s ugliness, facilitating the welfare of the child. In the context of adults, we ignore the sufferings of people around the world, even the ones that are right in front of us, otherwise we would spend our days being sickened and depressed by the state of the world. As an example, for a long time, I was (and still am) sorely tempted to stop reading the newspaper, just so I wouldn’t have to read about these things.
But in particular, rather than general, cases, denial can take an ugly face. A parent who thinks its child is an angel when it actually is a pain is in denial. A person who fails to admit to any mistake s/he has made might not necessarily be arrogant, s/he might be in denial, which later hurts that person more than anyone else.
Today, we see two major instances of large-scale denial. The first is sexuality. Our parents do not tell us about sex. They want to avoid the embarrassment and awkwardness. Therefore, they take comfort in the belief that we will learn it on our own. This can lead to absurdities like what has recently come to light in Hong Kong, where a large percentage of newly-wed couple do not know what they were supposed to do next (“don’t know where their sex organs are” were the exact words – click here for more). A lot of the time, we do learn it on our own, but we mostly learn a distortion of the truth, which usually leads to either a feeling of guilt, or a feeling of nervousness, confusion, and sometimes to misplaced aggression. I remember that when I was 12, a friend gave me a Xerox copy of a biology text dealing with reproduction. I hid it well, so that I could read it at night, but my parents found it and they tore it up. When I was little, my grandmother forbade me to touch my genitals, saying that it would cause some kind of disease. You can see where I’m going with that.
In the other instance of large-scale denial, we see that denial is the basis of modern religion. I am not referring to the mythology and theosophy of religion, but to the reason why people take to religion. They want to assuage a deeply hidden feeling of guilt or uncertainty, and they decide that they will place all the responsibility on a God. After this, they are free to blame God, and whenever they have a feeling of guilt, they offload it on God by prayer. Here’s a somewhat snide (and, some might feel, unrelated) example: I am a somnambulist, and in my early teenage, I feared that perhaps I would reveal all my ‘dirty’ fantasies in my sleep. Therefore, just before going to sleep, I would fervently pray, so that if I said anything in my sleep by chance, this would be what I said.
Denial takes different forms for different people. On one hand is the pre-teenage boy who refuses to believe that his mother ever had sex, and on the other hand are the custodians of our welfare who are turning blue in the face screaming that skimpy clothes cause sexual abuse of women, who perhaps believe that abuse did not exist in the 18th and 19th centuries.
As I said, denial does not necessarily have to be of an unpleasant fact. Anorexic people deny the fact that they are slim, and proceed to make themselves thinner. A person with feelings of inferiority, who might develop a complex, does not actually need to be inferior to do so. This can happen on its own or under pressure from parents, friends and other people. I know students who developed feelings of guilt and inferiority because their parents insisted they didn’t study, without bothering to check whether they actually did or not. This led to the students feeling that they did not do anything well.
The only solution to denial is to realise and rectify it, which can only be done by realising and rectifying it, so you can see where that argument is going. I’m not going to try and offer a solution. That is for everybody to find out for themselves.
I have only scratched the surface of this topic – perhaps I’ll write more in another post. Till then, ciao. [Sorry for the abrupt ending. I like abrupt endings.]
July 13, 2005 9:27 pm
This comment has been removed by the author.
July 13, 2005 9:57 pm
@Scout: It is pretty controversial, which is one of the reasons I wrote about it. About the last line, I didn't know what to write there. Usually, my endings are better.
@Anangbhai: You're right. On a personal note, my parents didn't 'lie' as such, but they hid the truth a lot. One day, long after I got to know about sex, I pointedly asked my mother, "What is sex?" She said I'll know about it when I grow up. I gave up after that. My cousins and friends have had similar experiences. It creates unnecessary problems.
July 13, 2005 11:55 pm
Aditya, good write up.
July 14, 2005 5:33 am
yeah bidi its photocopy.. Xerox is not a word in da dictionary.. or smthin like tat,... dunno for sure myself..
well about the topic.. parents do lie about a lot of things. Its just not about sex (my dad did have a conv. wid me about it.. tellin me tat soon u will b talkin wid ur friends about it nd etc etc etc) but many other things too. I have seen that many times, when there is smething very serious mishap(to be taken as mis - hap , not an accident) in the family, I never know anything about it.
There are so many things that I am unaware of because my parents are quiet about it but my younger cousin knows all the details about it.
July 14, 2005 11:40 am
well we all live in the biggest denial of all - tht we r all gonna die someday!
which makes us take life too seriously and results in pride/envy/greed/religious fundamentalism - u name it...
we forget wht some wisecrack said: "dont take life too seriously- u 'll never get out of it alive" :-)
July 14, 2005 12:30 pm
@Atanu: Thanks. I think I got the content right, but the flow is a bit iffy. :)
@Scout: The only mistake I made there, according to Webster's, is to use 'copy' after 'xerox'. 'Xerox' has become a generic name for any kind of photocopy. The uppercase was the fault of Word. But I'm gonna keep it as it is. Perhaps, generations later, someone will read it and say, "Hmm ... Quaint!"
@Varun: The problem is that the details we get are not quite correct, and they're not given with the right attitude. I also experienced the 'hiding from the kid' thing a lot, but that's not always denial, that's usually underestimation of your understanding capacity.
@Suman: I actually plan to write a post on death as well, and denial is certainly a major part of that. Taking life too seriously is certainly one of the most fatal things one can do.
July 15, 2005 11:20 am
aditya, great post- I think denial is a way we have devised of dealing with unpleasant things - if I refuse to think about it or accept it, it will go away.
"The only solution to denial is to realise and rectify it," - what denial problem? I dont have any problem. I dont know what you are talking about.
July 15, 2005 12:05 pm
Thanks Charu. That's exactly what denial is, and the worst thing is that most people don't realise what they're in denial about (that's in the definition, isn't it?).
The last part is just what I observed. I don't have nay experience of it myself. Never been in any kind of denial.
July 17, 2005 11:36 am
denial is not the problem ,the circumstances creating it or created by it are the problem.
cuz sometimes ignorance is bliss!!
July 18, 2005 7:26 am
good post! though i cant be as gentle on denial as you are: i see it a cussed very deliberate effort to blind ones self for the sake of comfort. while one persons denial may mean their short term freedom, it may mean the repression and curtailing of freedom for another.which is what usually happens with sex, and related definitions of whats "normal".
im sorry, while this isnt part of the main argument, i HAD to make a detour : a parent loving an ugly child... ugly being relative, the child may genuinely NOT seem ugly to the parent you know. even better, if the child DID seem ugly to the parent, rather than blindly denying it, the parent may love the child for all the other lovely qualities it has. (appearance is seriously overrated!)
id say real comfort and freedom come not from denial but from acceptance - looking it in the eye as it were :)
waiting for the contd. post :)
July 18, 2005 9:32 pm
Thanks, m. I am rather gentle on it, I know, but I think it's not always a deliberate attempt (although sometimes it sure is), though that doesn't make it any less dangerous.
You're quite right about the 'ugly child' aspect. I didn't think of it that way.
Looking things in the eye is rather difficult, and sometimes we can't be sure we have done it. For example, a person thinking s/he has conquered denial might be denying the fact that s/he hasn't!
July 20, 2005 10:51 pm
You said you're a somnambulist. So you write the words that you say while you're sleepwalking? You can't deny that you've got two left feet now.
July 21, 2005 2:51 am
Who? What? When? Where? Why?
I don't quite get what you're trying to say, but from what I do get:
I'm a somnambulist, but a rare one, I do spend some time per day awake, and although it might seem to some that my posts are written in my sleep, they are not.
But I don't understand the 'two left feet' remark at all. Please explain.
July 24, 2005 3:33 am
Thanks, Uma. :)