Tuesday, November 08, 2005
Now, as legions of comic book fans dance around naked in the street chanting, “We rule! We rule!”, it is a time for quiet contemplation here at the Bidikar quarters. Poor chap, is what struck me first. The kid, I mean, not Nick.
There is one upshot to this business, however, and that’s the fact that Kal-El will be idolised by his mates from the age of 3-8 years. But after that, God help him. And there is the sad chance that some of his friends might persuade him to jump out of a window, and then he will be, as we Python fans might put it, an ex-Kal-El.
But the good thing is that in a few years’ time he will be able to legally change his name to Clark Kent. And then he’ll be rid of the name of his silly parents. Or he might just turn out intelligent (however unlikely that might be), and persuade his dad to send him off the planet in a tiny space-ship, so that he will be far away from the bullies of his future.
But till then, we must stay quiet and wait. Perhaps next week we might hear of someone naming their kid ‘Dennis’. (Oh, you don’t think that’s funny? You really don’t know much, do you?)
Note: To that rare unfortunate soul who hasn’t understood a word of this – please visit this page.
November 12, 2005 7:03 am
Seen this?
November 12, 2005 8:47 am
That link is so cool. Thanks a million.
November 12, 2005 1:01 pm
Funnily enough I was reading The Namesake when I heard this news. And he thought Gogol was a bad name.
November 13, 2005 8:44 am
Gogol has nice ring to it - as a last name. 'Gogol Ganguli' is just inviting trouble.
Haven't read The Namesake though. Swore off Jhumpa Lahiri ever since The Interpreter of Maladies.
November 13, 2005 10:19 am
Your loss. I did think it was a rather good book. What didnt you like about Interpreter of Maladies, btw?
November 13, 2005 12:12 pm
I thought that The Interpreter of Maladies was a rather clumsily written book - very heavy-handed, which was odd considering that subtlety was one of its advertised virtues. I only read 3-4 stories in it, but I found nothing stimulating in those.
But that was some time ago, and I might try it out again (and The Namesake too) if somebody convinces me that it might be worth it.
November 18, 2005 7:02 am
talking of celebrity fixation for strange names, this hollywood actress has apprantly named her poor kid audio science!!??!!
February 28, 2007 11:34 pm
You have an outstanding good and well structured site. I enjoyed browsing through it »